The court has ruled that police don't violate the Fourth Amendment when they go through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant.
法院裁定，警察在没有搜查令的情况下检查被捕者的钱包或手提包时，并不违反第四修正案。
They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while waiting for a warrant.
在面对严重而紧急的情况时，他们仍然可以推翻第四修正案的保护措施，并且在等待搜查令期间，他们可以采取合理措施确保手机数据不会被删除或篡改。
Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.
法律教授奥林·凯尔将21世纪数字信息的爆炸式增长和易于获取性，与20世纪汽车使用成为生活必需品的情况进行了类比：当时法官们不得不为私家车这一新的个人领域制定新的规则；如今，他们也必须厘清第四修正案如何适用于数字信息。
例句取自历年考研英语真题，翻译为机器生成，仅供学习参考。