And yet, John Hagel, author of The Power of Pull and other books, says Brynjolfsson and McAfee miss the reason why these jobs are so vulnerable to technology in the first place.
然而，约翰·哈格尔——《拉力的力量》等书的作者——表示，布里尼奥尔森和麦卡菲忽略了这些工作之所以最初就如此容易受到技术冲击的原因。
Hagel says we have designed jobs in the u.s. that tend to be “tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave no room for “individual initiative or creativity”.
哈格尔说，我们在美国设计的工作往往都是'高度脚本化'和'高度标准化'的，完全没有给'个人主动性或创造力'留下空间。
That is how we have put a giant target sign on the backs of American workers, Hagel says.
哈格尔说，这就是我们为何在美国家工的背上挂上了巨大的'目标牌'。
It’s time to reinvent the formula for how work is conducted, since we are still relying on a very 20th century notion of work, Hagel says.
哈格尔表示，现在是时候重新设计工作开展的公式了，因为我们仍在依赖一种非常20世纪的工作观念。
As Hagel notes, Brynjolfsson and McAfee indeed touched on this point in their book.
正如哈格尔指出的，布林约尔松和麦卡菲确实在他们的书中触及了这一点。
例句取自历年考研英语真题，翻译为机器生成，仅供学习参考。