Many Americans regard the jury system as a concrete expression of crucial democratic values, including the principles that all citizens who meet minimal qualifications of age and literacy are equally competent to serve on juries; that jurors should be selected randomly from a representative cross section of the community; that no citizen should be denied the right to serve on a jury on account of race, religion, sex, or national origin; that defendants are entitled to trial by their peers; and that verdicts should represent the conscience of the community and not just the letter of the law.
许多美国人将陪审团制度视为关键民主价值观的具体体现，包括以下原则：所有符合年龄和读写能力最低要求的公民在担任陪审员方面都是同样胜任的；陪审员应从社区中具有代表性的各个群体中随机选出；不应因种族、宗教、性别或民族出身而剥夺任何公民担任陪审员的权利；被告有权接受同辈的审判；以及陪审团的裁决应体现社区的良知，而不仅仅是法律条文。
This law abolished special educational requirements for federal jurors and required them to be selected at random from a cross section of the entire community.
该法律废除了联邦陪审员的特殊教育要求，并规定必须从整个社区的各个层面随机选拔陪审员。
The Taylor decision also declared sex discrimination in jury selection to be unconstitutional and ordered states to use the same procedures for selecting male and female jurors.
泰勒案的裁决还宣布，在陪审团选拔中存在性别歧视是违宪的，并命令各州在选拔男性和女性陪审员时使用相同的程序。
educational requirements became less rigid in the selection of federal jurors
教育要求在联邦陪审员的选拔中变得不那么严格
jurors at the state level ought to be representative of the entire community
州级陪审员应该代表整个社区
例句取自历年考研英语真题，翻译为机器生成，仅供学习参考。