The researchers' argument stems from a simple observation about social influence: With the exception of a few celebrities like Oprah Winfrey - whose outsize presence is primarily a function of media, not interpersonal, influence - even the most influential members of a population simply don't interact with that many others.
研究人员的论点源于对社会影响的一个简单观察：除了像奥普拉·温弗瑞这样少数几位其巨大影响力主要源于媒体而非人际影响的名人外，人群中最有影响力的人实际上并不与太多其他人互动。
This argument has attracted a lot of attention, via the success of the book Race Against the Machine, by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, who both hail from MIT’s Center for Digital Business.
这一论点因埃里克·布里尼奥尔森和安德鲁·麦卡菲合著的《与机器赛跑》一书的成功而受到广泛关注，这两位作者均来自麻省理工学院数字商业中心。
This is a powerful argument, and a scary one.
这是一个有力且令人不安的论点。
They should start by discarding California's lame argument that exploring the contents of a smartphone - a vast storehouse of digital information - is similar to, say, going through a suspect's purse.
他们应该从摒弃加利福尼亚州提出的拙劣论点开始，即探索智能手机的内容——一个巨大的数字信息存储库——类似于翻查嫌疑人的手提包。
But the justices should not swallow California's argument whole.
但法官们不应全盘接受加利福尼亚州的论点。
例句取自历年考研英语真题，翻译为机器生成，仅供学习参考。